Fondo Foca arpa
Fondo de escritorio de Foca arpa
Fondos Relacionados
Comentarios.
In some ways, we already DO have enierntt identities, and we have had these for a very long time: your IP address. This little bit of information is the only thing that can correlate physical people to handles or personas on-line. It\\\'s how police is able to mark people in the real world to a sex-predator alias on a chat-board, or how hackers get marked by trying to breach Pentagon security. But this also has its faults and workarounds. As a member of the IT community, I am all too aware of the hacks and vulnerabilities of masquerading your IP(re-directing, web-hopping, ghosting , spoofing , etc). It is too simple and ineffective to rely on a 1:1 map between users and on-line aliases.I guess we are somewhere in between having complete IDs / passports on-line and 100% anonymity. A couple of comments about your article, though: If I had to register and get an enierntt license as Kaspersky suggests, I think that I would probably simply quit using the enierntt. Kudos to you for suggesting this, but I would say: give it a week. I don\\\'t mean take some time to re-think your position, this is more of a challenge: try going one whole week without using the enierntt. No surfing the enierntt, no instant messaging, no twitter, no iPhone apps (surprise! Cell phones access satellites which use the enierntt so cell phones are out as well). It\\\'s a lot more of a challenge in our society today to stay un-connected , and still remain currant and functioning in the world. Maybe not so for stay-at-home moms, retirees, or college students in my industry, however, its almost essential to stay in instant contact with anyone. How do you really stop a country from accessing the enierntt? Ask nicely? Go there and physically cut the communications lines? Just ask China If this were attempted, methinks another, free enierntt would most likely just crop up and gain in popularity, the same way freeware crops when companies charge too much for software, or regulate software too much. I was just looking over last month\\\'s Linux Journal, when the last article of the magazine suggested exactly this same thing: a user-owned-and-operated enierntt. Sounds Sexy, but would never work in practice. For the most part to put it bluntly the majority of users are just too in-experienced and un-equipped to be able to make it all work. Its part of the same reason why, even though the Linux Operating-system is 100% FREE (and modifiable!) to its users, it is still being dwarfed by the usership percentages of the costly (and fully regulated and un-modifiable) versions of Windows and OS-X.
